How come E90 but not E85

[kaweahnet]

How come there is an E90 thead under ///M (for a car that does not yet exist) ... but there is no E85 (a car that most definitely exists)?

Hmmmm .... :dunno:

[Bruce]

It is most likely due to the fact that the Z3 M roadster is discussed with the other Z3s (they wanted it that way).

Saw a 4 M roadster tonight. Definitely a car I won;t buying- no way in hell I fit. I will say that if I sat in a Z3 M roadster before I bought it I wouldn't have bought it for the same reason.

[Pinecone]

Yeap, more in common with other Z cars, and not enough of them to support a separate section.

[kaweahnet]

Yeap, more in common with other Z cars, and not enough of them to support a separate section.

Well, I do disagree with that statement. The 2006 M roadster is more like an M car than it is a Z4. At least to the point that an M3 is more like an M car than it is a 3-series. There is no surpise to me that the regular Z3 & Z4 members don't care about a seperate thread ... duh ... but then again I'm seeing M Coupe and M Roadster owners voting anti-M also. Go figure. It's not about segregation and posting in a different location, but it is more like the MZ3/MZ4 is not accepted as a true M car.

But no worries ... the Z3 & Z4 will be the only production M cars that don't warrant their own section under M-Series. That's cool. Exclusivity, that's why I chose M Roadster over an M3 Cabriolet ... so I guess this is what I get. :D