PDA

View Full Version : For the $$ X3 or X5?


FireFly
12-06-2003, 10:00 AM
I priced out an X3 (3.0) and X5 (3.0) with sport package, premium package, cold weather package, auto, xenon, metalic paint.

The X5 comes in at $50,550
The X3 comes in at $45,075

The interior is better in the X5 but both have the same engine and drive system. Is the X5 (3.0) worth $5k more? Do you think they will phase out the X5 (3.0) to boost sales of the X3 (3.0)?

If you are able to do ED with the X3 (can't with the X5) then it drops the pice by ~$10k. That's a pretty big price difference for "essentially" a similar vehicle.

Although some may thing the X3 is overpriced, I have to think I'm not the only one thinking an X5 (3.) for $50k is extremely overpriced???

Am I missing something here?

Emission
12-06-2003, 10:14 AM
I priced out an X3 (3.0) and X5 (3.0) with sport package, premium package, cold weather package, auto, xenon, metalic paint.

The X5 comes in at $50,550
The X3 comes in at $45,075

The interior is better in the X5 but both have the same engine and drive system. Is the X5 (3.0) worth $5k more? Do you think they will phase out the X5 (3.0) to boost sales of the X3 (3.0)?

If you are able to do ED with the X3 (can't with the X5) then it drops the pice by ~$10k. That's a pretty big price difference for "essentially" a similar vehicle.

Although some may thing the X3 is overpriced, I have to think I'm not the only one thinking an X5 (3.) for $50k is extremely overpriced???

Am I missing something here?

Too funny.

Hmmm... let's compare the E39 and E46. Why buy the 530i when you can get "essentially" the same vehicle in the 330i. Hey, even the 530i chassis was a bit dated! Sure, the E39 is a bit bigger, but hey, the 330i is faster!

The X5 has more passenger room than the X3. Period. A 6'2" individual can sit back there and not make anyone move seats. The shoulder room is also generous. The X3 gives that space to the trunk (hence the bragging rights) but the X5 will drive much better.

My question: For $5K, who would NOT UPGRADE to the X5?

I like the X3. I like the X5. They are two different vehicles, serving two different customers. If the X3 was to replace the X5 (a hot seller for BMW), it would be called the "next" X5.

FireFly
12-06-2003, 10:44 AM
I don't think the X3 would ever replace the X5 but if X3 (3.0) moves better than the X5 (3.0), would it make sense to offer the X5 with only the larger engine options and "force" people to purchase the X3 (3.0) if they want a more affordable BMW Suv?

I like them both. Probably like the X5 more. I think I'll wait until next fall to see if there will be any deals on 2004 X3's or X5's (3.0) - I have a feeling one will be selling lot better than the other.

Good point about the 3.0 sedans.

Some people may visit a BMW dealership looking to get into the affordable BMW Suv and decide that the X5 is a better deal for the $$, and some may look to buy the X5 and decide that the X3 is just as good (in their opinion) and go for the X3.

It will be interesting to see what BMW sells more of - X3 (3.0) or X5(3.0) - anyone want to guess?

Technic
12-06-2003, 04:20 PM
For my money, the X5 is much better vehicle than the X3. Although I thought for a moment of getting an X3 when my lease is up, I went again to see it at the dealership and I can't get over its low quality interior vs the X5's.

Yes, X5 is worth $5k more inside and out than the X3. Actually, the X3 is way overpriced in my book at $45k. Considering, a V8 Tourareg for $50k blows these two away in value IMO, interior quality (absolutely no match), space and practicability, and based on car magazines it is not that far away in driving dynamics on road from the X5. Off road there is no competition...

So it seems to come down to what you are really looking for other than straight money. :dunno:

Tanin
12-06-2003, 07:20 PM
It will be interesting to see what BMW sells more of - X3 (3.0) or X5(3.0) - anyone want to guess?


BMW is going to push the crap out of the X3 next year! I forget what the #'s were but BMW has set some extremely high quotas for the X3. Whatever it takes to move them they will do it (i.e. residual, MF, rates). I was talking to my dealer and he said his allocation for X5's next year will be extremely small. BMW NA will put all of it's effort into the X3.

beware_phog
12-07-2003, 06:52 AM
Too funny.

Hmmm... let's compare the E39 and E46. Why buy the 530i when you can get "essentially" the same vehicle in the 330i. Hey, even the 530i chassis was a bit dated! Sure, the E39 is a bit bigger, but hey, the 330i is faster!

The X5 has more passenger room than the X3. Period. A 6'2" individual can sit back there and not make anyone move seats. The shoulder room is also generous. The X3 gives that space to the trunk (hence the bragging rights) but the X5 will drive much better.

My question: For $5K, who would NOT UPGRADE to the X5?

I like the X3. I like the X5. They are two different vehicles, serving two different customers. If the X3 was to replace the X5 (a hot seller for BMW), it would be called the "next" X5.

Who wouldn't "upgrade"? Well...me. If I was more interested in passenger space I'd get the 530. The X3 offers more cargo and more cargo flexibility. I have sat in both and the differences between the two aren't noticeable to me. I honestly don't see a difference in interior "quality". And finally, with an opportunity to go ED, that makes the price difference even more pronounced.

emPoWaH
12-07-2003, 10:18 AM
I'd spend the extra $5K and get the X5. To me, the X3 just doesn't make sense... a 325iX wagon can do everything a X3 can. But a 5-series wagon can't do everything a X5 can - tow 5,000 lbs, etc.

Emission
12-07-2003, 11:06 AM
Who wouldn't "upgrade"? Well...me. If I was more interested in passenger space I'd get the 530.

My wife and I went to the dealership to buy a 525iT. We drove home in the X5. The passenger space in the X5 was much greater (inches!). There was no comparison.

My good friends are replacing their 530i with an X5 because it has more room in the back seat.

suzer
12-07-2003, 05:00 PM
Just saw the X3 last night (BMWCCA annual meeting/party held at dealership).

I thought it was really cute. The interior doesn't seem cheap-o to me, there's just less luxury. I thought the moonroof was cool, couldn't really understand the cargo thingy in the back. There wasn't an opportunity to drive it, although I'm going in on Wednesday to get my oil changed (5000 miles on Mr. Silverfish's odometer), so I might try.

I think it's a better bigger brother/little brother pairing than the Rav4 introduction was to the 4Runner - when I was going to buy my 4Runner the dealer said to wait and see if the Rav4 would be more what I needed. It turned out to be so tiny that it was more toy than car (how was I supposed to fit my hound dog it that?). The X3 seems more usable, but it did seem pricey. Unless they are going to "push the crap" out of them, it would be hard in my mind to stay with the X3. I'd either get the xi wagon, or the X5, depending on whether I wanted cargo room, passenger amenities or commanding height.

Sean
12-13-2003, 08:55 PM
Hands down I rather have a CPO'ed 3.0 X5 vs. a new 3.0 X3.

eelnoraa
12-30-2003, 03:08 AM
Hands down I rather have a CPO'ed 3.0 X5 vs. a new 3.0 X3.

Totally agree!

My major disappointment is the X3 interior quality. I consider myself to have a low standard on interior material. To show you where I am coming from, I actaully think E46,Z4, E60 all have a very good looking interior, NOT cheap at all in person, while a lot of people complaint about them.

OK, when I stepped into the Mystic Blue/Gray X3 that every dealer got, I must say the interior is on the low quality side. Almost everything from the instrument panel, the aluminum trim, the center console, the door handle are NOT on par with any other present BMW models. I would say it is only on par with Toyota Camry/Honday Accord. People who have problems with Z4 and E60 interior should definitely have problems with X3 interior. I could not accept X3 interior quality for its price.

eel

beware_phog
12-30-2003, 06:42 AM
Totally agree!

My major disappointment is the X3 interior quality. I consider myself to have a low standard on interior material. To show you where I am coming from, I actaully think E46,Z4, E60 all have a very good looking interior, NOT cheap at all in person, while a lot of people complaint about them.

OK, when I stepped into the Mystic Blue/Gray X3 that every dealer got, I must say the interior is on the low quality side. Almost everything from the instrument panel, the aluminum trim, the center console, the door handle are NOT on par with any other present BMW models. I would say it is only on par with Toyota Camry/Honday Accord. People who have problems with Z4 and E60 interior should definitely have problems with X3 interior. I could not accept X3 interior quality for its price.

eel

Mystic Blue/Grey isn't the best. Not sure why that's the chosen color for the year. I find a big difference between the grey, black and tan interior.

mkh
12-30-2003, 10:49 AM
Mystic Blue/Grey isn't the best. Not sure why that's the chosen color for the year. I find a big difference between the grey, black and tan interior.
No, it's not the color. It's the quality of the material (eg. the thickness and texture of the plastic/vinyl). Just like the difference between a $20 plastic toy and a $200 plastic equipment. I even think the Accord and Camry offer better material. The X3's quality is closer to the Civic and Corolla. For the same price, I would get a stripped X5 over a loaded X3 anytime.

beware_phog
12-30-2003, 03:03 PM
No, it's not the color. It's the quality of the material (eg. the thickness and texture of the plastic/vinyl). Just like the difference between a $20 plastic toy and a $200 plastic equipment. I even think the Accord and Camry offer better material. The X3's quality is closer to the Civic and Corolla. For the same price, I would get a stripped X5 over a loaded X3 anytime.

For me, it IS the color. Grey stinks.

beware_phog
12-31-2003, 01:17 PM
I had a chance to drive an X3 yesterday. It was your typical blue/grey/golf ball trim model.

One of the things I was especially interested in was how firm the ride was. For comparison I have an 04 330 Cic with the syle 71 wheels. Thus, I'm coming from a firm ride.

I felt like the ride firmness in the X3 was comparible to the convertible. That's not a good thing since it was your non-sport version. I sat in both the rear seats and front seats.

The rest of the car and everything else was fine. The interior (except for the ugly grey) is like other three-series. If you are someone who wants to spend more money for the X5 that's fine as you are paying for a "better" interior without any more space.

I see the decision as similar to those who decide between the 3 and 5 series except with the 5 you are getting more space while in this case you aren't. For me, I'm planning on an ED so an X5 is not an option. And obviously if you want a bigger engine for towing, the X5 is the way to go.

Getting back to colors, they had a black/tan X3 in the showroom. I thought it looked great...because most importantly....no grey!

xmanjack
01-14-2004, 01:53 PM
I priced out an X3 (3.0) and X5 (3.0) with sport package, premium package, cold weather package, auto, xenon, metalic paint.

The X5 comes in at $50,550
The X3 comes in at $45,075

The interior is better in the X5 but both have the same engine and drive system. Is the X5 (3.0) worth $5k more? Do you think they will phase out the X5 (3.0) to boost sales of the X3 (3.0)?

If you are able to do ED with the X3 (can't with the X5) then it drops the pice by ~$10k. That's a pretty big price difference for "essentially" a similar vehicle.

Although some may thing the X3 is overpriced, I have to think I'm not the only one thinking an X5 (3.) for $50k is extremely overpriced???

Am I missing something here?


Are you crazy?Not only does the X3 look bad,they ride bad.Stick with the X5,and while your at it,go for the extra 15K and get the 4.4.Now that's a ride,and don't look back.You won't be sorry.

harplayr
01-15-2004, 08:51 AM
I think that they are both excellent cars. It would be foolish to say one car is GREAT and the other is a POS. It boils down to specific needs, wants and gut feelings.

I chose the X3 over the X5 for several reasons. One reason was the indoor bike rack feature. My wife and I are avid cyclists, and this feature is not available for the X5. I also liked how the X3 drove. In my opinion the X3 felt closer to my 325I in it’s handling, and the X5 felt “bigger” and not as crisp. For me the X3 was just plain more fun to drive. The X5 has its virtues, it felt more luxurious, and for some that may be what they want.

If you’re in the market, my advice would be to test drive both, and the other SUVs out there. Buy what suits you. We are fortunate that there are a lot of quality choices out there.

FireFly
01-15-2004, 09:06 AM
Are you crazy?Not only does the X3 look bad,they ride bad.Stick with the X5,and while your at it,go for the extra 15K and get the 4.4.Now that's a ride,and don't look back.You won't be sorry.

Xman- that really was not the point of my thread BUT if money were not an issue, the 4.4 would be the only SUV on the list. I can't believe all theH2 owners are settling for an inferior ride when they could be riding in style in an X5. Sure an H2 looks kewl but you still have to get behind the wheel and drive it everyday.

repo
01-17-2004, 04:23 PM
Xman- that really was not the point of my thread BUT if money were not an issue, the 4.4 would be the only SUV on the list. I can't believe all theH2 owners are settling for an inferior ride when they could be riding in style in an X5. Sure an H2 looks kewl but you still have to get behind the wheel and drive it everyday.


Funny, I see a guy in a H2 gassin gup today, and think how expensive the Hummer was, and then I realized the wifes X5,4.4 was more. :rofl:

Back to the X3,,,my salesman said the residuals were so bad(end of Dec) that you could lease a X5 for the same money. :eek:

Plus they look claustrophic to me.

Good luck with your choice.

beware_phog
01-18-2004, 08:08 AM
Seems like most of the neg posters on the X3 are current X5 owners. Are you afraid of little brother? :)

Heck, if money was no object, I'd hire people to drag stuff around for me and I'd lead the way in a Z8.

FireFly
01-18-2004, 08:30 AM
Seems like most of the neg posters on the X3 are current X5 owners. Are you afraid of little brother? :)

Heck, if money was no object, I'd hire people to drag stuff around for me and I'd lead the way in a Z8.

If you think its bad here, check roadfly for the X5 owners bashing the X3. I really don't care because I own neither but it is a bit jouvenile.

I have driven both and would take an X3 3.0 over the X5 3.0 because they are more or less the same vehicle with the X3 having a better ride but the X5 having a better interior. Everything else is pretty much a wash when comparing the two vehicles.

Nick325xiT 5spd
01-18-2004, 08:41 AM
I'd take the X5 for the towing capacity.

Beyond that, I'm not particularly thrilled with the way either one of them drives. (Note that I've only driven an X3 3.0i and an X5 4.4i.) I'd much rather spend a lot less on a pickup with serious hauling capacity than on an "SAV" with somewhat limited capabilities in the two arenas I'd actually want a "truck" for.

Emission
01-18-2004, 10:13 AM
Seems like most of the neg posters on the X3 are current X5 owners. Are you afraid of little brother? :)

Very good observation. :)

Change is frightening, and the X3 is change - as now there are two SAV's in the line-up.

Personally, I think they are both very different, much like the 3-series and 5-series. Someone who is looking at the X5 really shouldn't settle for an X3, while an X3 shopper wouldn't even consider the X5, even if the price was identical. They are both very different.

JetBlack330i
01-18-2004, 10:38 AM
I don't own either one, but I drove both.
To me, both are overpriced. The X3 more than the X5.
The X3 is only $5K cheaper than the X5, but it feels substantially cheaper. In addition, the same engine seem to perform better in the heavier X5.
In my opinion, they need to price the X3 another $5K lower.

Emission
01-18-2004, 11:51 AM
I don't own either one, but I drove both.
To me, both are overpriced. The X3 more than the X5.
The X3 is only $5K cheaper than the X5, but it feels substantially cheaper. In addition, the same engine seem to perform better in the heavier X5.
In my opinion, they need to price the X3 another $5K lower.

The X3 is overpriced, even more than the X5.

On the other hand, I think every SUV on the market is overpriced (do you think a Dodge Durango is really worth $39,000?) so the BMW's are just priced to keep with the competition.

beware_phog
01-18-2004, 02:33 PM
The X3 is overpriced, even more than the X5.

On the other hand, I think every SUV on the market is overpriced (do you think a Dodge Durango is really worth $39,000?) so the BMW's are just priced to keep with the competition.

Agreed. Somehow i've convinced myself that a 50K X5 is overpriced while a 40K X3 is only slightly overpriced. ED on the X3 makes it "reasonable".