![]() |
First Photos of F80 M3 Engine - Turbo Inline 6 CONFIRMED
![]() The next generation BMW M3 sedan, chassis code F80, has been spied with the hood up showing off the engine. As confirmed by BMW CEO Ludwig Willisch at Bimmerfest 2012 the next generation M3 is indeed a twin turbo inline 6 cylinder. This puts to rest any rumors of a V6 engine for the next generation M3. The new M3 engine borrows technology from the M5/M6 engine. The air-to-water intercooler is clearly evident on the right of the motor and the two intake tubes confirm two turbos feeding it. The oil cooler housing is right off the N54/N55 so that gives some hint that engine displacement will be around 3.0 to 3.5 liters. Power is estimated to be 450hp with about the same for torque, putting the M3 above its rivals for power. The next generation M3 will also be packed with technology to put the power down faster and more effectively. The active differential from the M5/M6 will make its way over, along with an all aluminum suspension and solid mount rear subframe. Look for the M3 to shed considerable weight over the F30 sedan as well making it faster in a straight line as well as through the corners. View more F80 M3 engine pictures at AutoExpress Stay tuned for more F80 M3 news as we get it. |
Hey, tim. Running a little behind? :) I think these were published at least a week ago.
|
Awe, what did you gain by saying that? :rofl: Now, did the CEO promise better time than the Carrera S at Nürburgring Nordschleife, say 7:50 ish?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qFp7huFzy3M |
If only one can be had for around $50k:)
|
Love to hear the part about a "considerable" weight savings from the current model. Looking forward to seeing the final product and placing my order!
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The F30 sedan has steel front and rear sub frames so making those out of aluminum would be an easy place to start. Aluminum hood? Or will they go all carbon fiber this time around, a carbon fiber hood, roof and trunk would be a huge weight savings. There are plenty of places to take weight out of the car, what it cost to develop and produce the parts is what holds cars to their portly 3500lbs+ weight. Tim |
Quote:
|
No doubt the new M3/M4 will be more powerful and faster - however, for me the crucial question is - will the new M offer the same sense of connectivity which defines the E92 M3 as a true driver's car. My guess is that the new M3/4M4 will be a wonderful car but possess a very different character à la F10 M5. If this change is a good thing or not remains to be seen and driven.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The F10 M5 offers higher performance but I am told it offers a less involving experience...( I have not driven the new M5) My alternative to the new M4 is a 991 but the 991 has also been morphed into a very different kind of 911 - higher performance but less visceral at real world speeds...a la BMW. Speaking of Porsches - look at the change from 993 to 996 - you can buy a 996 for next to nothing but 993s are beginning to appreciate. Goes to show that it usually takes some time to realize what you don't have. If I end up keeping my E92 M3 I won't be unhappy - in terms of my needs and desires I think my E92 M3 is perfect - hard to beat perfect. |
Quote:
Assuming the Ms stick with hydraulic steering, they may not lose the feel that the non-M cars are losing. |
Quote:
I wonder if the last of the naturally aspirated M cars will also retain their value? |
Quote:
All I can say is thank god for the 4 year warranty I don't mind going into the shop once a day as long as its free lol. Back on the M3 the more I look at that picture the more it rubs me the wrong way lol... I mean it looks like the 4banger! http://0.tqn.com/d/cars/1/0/F/K/1/ag_08m3_engine2.jpg That is menacing!!! Same with the v10 m5 engine :eeps: http://1.bp.blogspot.com/__kjL7rUis0...ine_BMW_M5.jpg |
There is no visible power steering fluid reservoir so I'm thinking it is electronic power steering.
Tim |
Quote:
|
The look of the engine bay? I like it, it isn't overly done up with plastic. M engines are technical marvels and complex machinery that shouldn't be covered up with big bits of plastic so you can pop the hood and everything looks nice. You should see the engine, not some covers that look "cool".
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://www.**************/RoadTests/...gineGry-md.jpg |
Very happy if the M3 is going back to an inline six, personally.
My one concern is that the m3, for 25 years, has been a pretty low maintenance and good long-term-ownership car. Bulletproof N/A engines with low levels of complexity helped that. Now we're going to be introducing multiple turbos, cooling componentry, and a very high specific output for any engine. If it's 3.0 liters and 450hp, it would be 150hp/liter - quite high for a factory output. Should be a blast to drive, but the 60-90k mile ownership experience will be interesting compared to the relatively easy going e9x, e46, e36, and e30. P.s. My N/A e39 m5 is an example of a M that is fairly cost to maintain in mid-life, so I know whence from what I speak :) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I hope they get this one right. The EPS implementation on the F10 isn't an encouraging precedence though. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The question is how well BMW will execute it... So far, I haven't seen a single BMW with good EPS. I test drove the F10 and E89, and I was pretty disappointed in both. |
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:59 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
© 2001-2011 performanceIX, Inc. All Rights Reserved .: guidelines .:. privacy .:. terms