View Single Post
  #5  
Old 09-24-2012, 07:33 AM
tmvE39/E53/Z32's Avatar
tmvE39/E53/Z32 tmvE39/E53/Z32 is offline
Officially Welcomed to the 'Fest
Location: Seattle --> Atlanta
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,883
Mein Auto: 03 540, 06 E53 4.8, Z32TT
Quote:
Originally Posted by sunny5280 View Post
I owned a 2000 (85K) and 2001 (126K) 4.4i and they both had rock solid engines. Not sure why people believe the 4.4 is more unreliable than the 3.0. Some have theorized the 4.4's power puts more strain on the drive train. However I've seen no data to suggest failures are higher on the driver train with the 4.4.

It's my opinion the weak points on the E53 are non-engine related and therefore found with either engine. One exception being the oil separator freezing...not sure if the 3.0 has one and therefore prone to that issue.
I am with you on the engine liability as long as you keep up with the maintenance. The 3.0 DOES have oil separator (Crankcase Vent Valve)
OP, if you're a DIYer, you can cut the maintennace cost to half. Many people can affort to buy BMWs but can't affort to own one.
__________________

FS 2001 ///M5
http://www.bimmerfest.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=791509
2000 Dinan S1 //M5 (my DD) 06 DINAN E53 4.8iS (wife's DD), 90 Straman Z32TT (my pride & joy ride)

Gone, but not forgotten: 01 E53 3.0i, 01 525i Sport, 03 DINAN 540i MSport and 91 Z32TwinTurbo
Reply With Quote