I have a 2009 M3 automatic with 45,000 miles that sustained water damage to the engine during flooding recently. I have the option of getting a new engine put in it (would have to pay about $3500 due to betterment rule) or get $45,000 for it being considered totalled and could puchase a 2010 or 2011 with probably fewer miles. My current car has dual clutch transmission, cold weather package, moonroof, and is black/black.
I also would take the money. Flooding doesn't just damage a car's engine. Everything steel can rust and anything electronic can corrode as well. You'd be very likely to have further issues later on that insurance may not decide to cover.
Agree with the previous responses, take the cash and buy a new one. If there is water damage to the engine what about the other components? Why take a chance.
I don't know if this makes a difference or not but the insurance company said they would cover any damages that could not be evaluated or determined until a new engine was put in.
You sound like you desperately want to keep the car for whatever reason. Ask them point-blank whether they will pay you out for diminished value, and if the answer is no, take the money and run.
Makes no difference, take the money and get shopping. While the repaired car may be as good as new, it will always carry that flood title which significantly impacts future resale. Take the $45k and another car...
No question, take the money. You can buy a new(er) one with far less miles for a few bucks more. Good luck!
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
BimmerFest BMW Forum
11.4M posts
753.1K members
Since 2001
A forum community dedicated to BMW owners and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about Bimmerfest events, production numbers, programming, performance, modifications, classifieds, troubleshooting, maintenance, and more! Bringing the BMW community together.