
|
|
||||||
|
E46 (1999 - 2006)
The fourth generation 3 Series (E46 chassis) was introduced in 1999 and set the standard for engineering and performance during it's years of production including being named to Car & Driver's 10 best list every one of those years! ! -- View the E46 Wiki |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Based on wading thru the deluge of complaints here on the 'Fest in the past 2.5 years I've been around, at least 17 of the items you list are also a headache in the E46 universe, so the answer to your question would seem to be: Not Very Well.
Too late and too tired to itemize the coincidences, but I'll get around to it if someone doesn't beat me to the punch.
__________________
2006 325Ci Last edited by jcourcoul; 07-14-2011 at 01:17 AM. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
------------- <(OO) ||| ||| (OO)> 2004 330xi ZPP Titanium Silver Last edited by aleks; 07-14-2011 at 06:07 AM. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
It seems they didn't fix most of the "traditional" (like the cooling system and suspension) BMW problems until the E9x, but they introduced new problems, arguably more serious (N52 lifters, HPFP, turbo waste gate). Interestingly enough, the only problem above that I've experienced on the M3 was the roundel chipping.
In my old car (330i ZHP) I've experienced
__________________
![]() Last edited by TerraPhantm; 07-14-2011 at 01:17 PM. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
BMW suspension terminology still throws me for a loop, even after doing extensive research shown in the BMW acronyms thread: - BMW-specific acronyms (list and definition) Note the four different names for the same suspension members! |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
You're right, the names are confusing. The suspension is pretty different though Generally I've always heard those "squigly" pieces (#4) referred to as "thrust arms" which we don't have at all in the E46. It seems #5 in the picture below (which is referred to as the wishbone in the ETK, and most people online refer to them as lower control arms) is "equivalent" to your #11, but we don't have anything that's equivalent to your #4. The bushings I was referring to would be #6/#7 (on non-Ms, the bushing doesn't separate from the bracket) ![]() With the E90s, BMW switched to a front suspension design much more similar to that of the E39
__________________
![]() |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
In fairness to BMW, I'd consider the e46 and e39 to be in basically the same design cycle, with introductions 2 years apart. I'm sure that the test mule e39s didn't develop any/many of the notorious issues until after the e46 design was sealed up and pre-production models started finding their way to the streets as test mules.
Now, should BMW have learned from the e36 issues, like the water pump? I guess they tried, with a metal impeller after a couple of model years (2000 or 2001 intro?) but still the design is flawed for the slushboxes with the clutched fan riding on the end of the shaft, rotating on bearings that just don't cut the mustard.
__________________
![]() #232
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
- E46 BMW Lower Control Arm Bushing Replacement (E46) So, maybe that's an "equivalent failure mode", which is in the spirit of what this thread is trying to identify the existence of. I agree! My best guess on the (confusing) 'naming' conventions across the three models is summarized below: E46 I6 front suspension arms: - Control arm (common name) = right wishbone (BMW name) = trailing control arm = lower control arm - Thrust arm (does not appear to exist on the E46; however, it 'may' be that the E46 "left wishbone" is the equivalent? If so, might this be the naming convention for that particular suspension component? - Thrust arm (common name) = left wishbone (BMW name) = trailing control arm = upper control arm In contrast, these are well established (albeit equally confusing) terms: Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think BMW engineers either ignored results of durability tests or skipped them.
But I tell you what? Bean counters in BMW are laughing all the way to the bank for the profit they are making from selling all these repair parts. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
My question is simple in regards to this thread's title. "Did BMW engineers learn from previous model mistakes in designing the E46 platform?"
And what if they didn't? We are talking about a car that isn't in production anymore. So what does it matter? Are you going to write a letter to BMW saying "I wish you had done better making the E46"? Everyone knows this stuff is common failure items on a BMW. And yet we still own them because we are willing to deal with the problems for the driving experience. I see no point in this thread at all. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
The part marked above with "could this be...." is actually a control arm bushing bracket. It holds the bushing which fits onto the end of the control arm/wishbone and is bolted onto the subframe.
__________________
------------- <(OO) ||| ||| (OO)> 2004 330xi ZPP Titanium Silver Last edited by aleks; 07-15-2011 at 11:32 AM. |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
Either you are part of the solution, or you are part of the problem. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Might want to add these E46/M54 specific issues to the list:
__________________
2006 325Ci |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
This thread today has an excellent list of E46 specific common repair problems:
-> E46 (1999 - 2006) > Preventive maintenance tips/questions For example: Quote:
__________________
Note: Your mission, should you decide to accept it, is to add value to those threads, either by pictures or by descriptions, so the next person with the same problem stands on your shoulders. See also: E39 Bestlinks & How to easily find what you need, in seconds! |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
IMHO, people will buy something based on its quality/price ratio, or based on a brand.
cars nowadays are experiencing deterioration in quality, and are becoming more Japanese-like built (with all due respect to Jap cars of course) and since the ratio of deterioration is somewhat equally based in all car manufacturers, people who were BMW dedicated will still buy the BMW because they are accustomed to their quality and build, and since other models are becoming of similar quality to BMW, some may also switch to BMW, since BMW triggers a prestigious brand name. and due to the above, they can fix let's say 10% per each model release and people will still buy them, they will tolerate BMW's nuisance because they love that BMW badge and its driving experience (personal experience) so why make the BMW perfect and lose the maintenance income, when they can make them suffer from this and that and earn a lot more money from spare parts since people will buy them anyway?
__________________
Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Give a man a Chef and he feeds him for a lifetime
|
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
E30 and E36 both got complains about being too small inside, E46 improved that part.
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Forum Navigation | |||||||
|
Today's Posts Search | ||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|