
|
|
||||||
|
E46 (1999 - 2006)
The fourth generation 3 Series (E46 chassis) was introduced in 1999 and set the standard for engineering and performance during it's years of production including being named to Car & Driver's 10 best list every one of those years! ! -- View the E46 Wiki |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#51
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
That's not to say I thought the ZHP was a bad car. Even in most street conditions, it does have enough low end grunt (esecially compared to cars like the WRX that have no pull whatsoever below boost). For me, upgrading to the M3 was more a right-place, right-time type of thing.
__________________
![]() Last edited by TerraPhantm; 01-18-2012 at 01:09 PM. |
|
#52
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
But to a true enthusiast we know that peak HP is only part of the mix. If I can out brake you, I will be zipping past you on entry to a corner. If I can out corner you, I am hitting the apex faster than you are and thus have more speed coming out of the corner. I think it was JVR826 or maybe KrisL that said their mildly modified ZHP (coilovers, sway bars) would hang with a stock E46 ///M on the track. As for ZHP passing power in 6th gear, it really depends on your speed. I usually cruise around 85mph (about 3000rpm, yea 5 speed guys, eat your hearts out) and can usually pass without issues. Having driven a few E46 ///M3's I can also agree, it is MUCH easier to pass. Those things get moving in a hurry...... |
|
#53
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() |
|
#54
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() 2005 330Ci (ZHP) = Daily Driver 1969 2002 = Project CarBMW Car Club of America # 427612 |
|
#55
|
||||
|
||||
|
All this talk about power and driving makes me want to go drive on the track again. I honestly care more for torque/handling over horsepower. I mean I'd rather come out of a corner quick with torque then be able to go in a straight line really fast.
__________________
http://www.luxury4play.com 2004 Maserati M128 GT 2000 3-series BMW supercharged Because race car.
|
|
#56
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
http://www.mfestforum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=13942
__________________
![]() 2005 330Ci (ZHP) = Daily Driver 1969 2002 = Project CarBMW Car Club of America # 427612 |
|
#57
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
http://www.luxury4play.com 2004 Maserati M128 GT 2000 3-series BMW supercharged Because race car.
|
|
#58
|
||||
|
||||
|
SD CCA chapter is doing HPDE at Chuckwalla in March, you should come. I think it might be in conjunction with LA chapter since they've done a few things like that together recently IIRC
__________________
![]() 2005 330Ci (ZHP) = Daily Driver 1969 2002 = Project CarBMW Car Club of America # 427612 |
|
#59
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
http://www.luxury4play.com 2004 Maserati M128 GT 2000 3-series BMW supercharged Because race car.
|
|
#60
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
EDIT: Golden Gate Chapter, Fri Feb 10 - Sat Feb 11 (prob not gonna work for you) http://www.ggcbmwcca.org/calendar/ic...driving-school
__________________
![]() 2005 330Ci (ZHP) = Daily Driver 1969 2002 = Project CarBMW Car Club of America # 427612 Last edited by Hermes; 01-18-2012 at 02:46 PM. |
|
#61
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
. Although I just noticed it's the LS driving school. I've done that one before. I actually did the $3k one. Thus a reason why I beat a F430 on Big willow ( good to know your car and how to drive it ). It was also the guys first time. Not surprising to beat some one whos never been on the track when I've been on it countless times.
__________________
http://www.luxury4play.com 2004 Maserati M128 GT 2000 3-series BMW supercharged Because race car.
Last edited by MalibuMafiaV; 01-18-2012 at 02:52 PM. |
|
#62
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#63
|
|||
|
|||
|
Added a note about flashing the EU2 tune yourself. Links go to E46Fanatics.com threads.
__________________
|
|
#64
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Sorry, but I'll save up my money for a shark or AA tune and eliminate the risks of this phantom tune. |
|
#65
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Arthur John Born 02-24-11 Has already been awarded the title "Destroyer of Sleep" |
|
#66
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
(R.I.P. Jever) *Please support the Wounded Warrior Project* |
|
#67
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() Sent from the Bamavarian Nexus.
__________________
|
|
#69
|
|||
|
|||
|
UPDATE!
I meant to post this earlier, but forgot. I can't edit the original post, so I'll just leave this here... Quote:
__________________
|
|
#70
|
|||
|
|||
|
The reason why cams seem to have "minimal" power gains is that people do these mods without understanding how an engine makes power or how cams work.
When you go to more lift and duration you lower your engines dynamic compression ratio (yes an engine has two compression ratios). The lower dynamic compression is what causes the perceived loss in low rpm torque. The solution is to raise your compression ratio by changing your pistons. The cam also shifts the power and higher, so one also needs to raise the rev limit to take advantage of the cams Also most people when shopping for cams want more power without changing how their engine feels. That's of course a ridiculous way to think. You need to plan your build before you build it. When you size the cams you have to consider replacing your pistons and doing the supporting mods to allow you to rev higher. Also I would never spend 2000+ for a mild cam, go big or go home. Finally you can make more power especially in a turbo setup by running a larger intake can than exhaust. The reason for this is that this setup increases dynamic compression. Also the more aggressive the intake came the lumpier the idle Last edited by 3star; 04-14-2013 at 11:12 PM. |
|
| Bookmarks |
| Forum Navigation | |||||||
|
Today's Posts Search | ||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|