
|
|
||||||
|
E60 (2004 - 2010)
BMW 5-Series (E60 chassis) was first seen in the Unites States in the fall of 2003 with a 2004 Model Year designation. The E60 is now available as a 528i, 528xi, 535i, 535xi, 550i and a 535xi sports wagon! -- View the E60 Wiki |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Alarming use of plastic for engine parts = probable premature failure
There is a rather alarming (IMO) trend in the automotive industry toward using plastic for certain engine parts. To be fair, it's not just BMW following this trend, but many others as well. Plastic instead of metal is being used for things like oil pans, intake manifolds and valve covers to name a few. However, in general, plastic and heat don't mix. I don't care what flavor of plastic is used, it's going to fail far earlier that a metal counterpart. The OEM's motivation is more than likely cost, as the tooling and materials for a plastic part are much cheaper than a metal one. But, are they passing those savings onto the consumer? Doesn't look like it; looks more like they are cutting their own costs while increasing the cost of ownership through more frequent repair needs.
My '05 545i had very few problems during the 4 year maintenance contract period, but shortly thereafter things went sour. With only about 70k miles on it, the plastic bit of the radiator failed, resulting in a leak, and necessitating the replacement of the whole thing. The Mechatronics sleeve (in the transmission) sprung a leak (this I understand is common on the 5), the active sway bar pump sprung a leak, the alternator went on the fritz, the plastic transmission pan itself warped and sprang a leak at the drain plug, and finally the engine oil pan has a leak as well. $6000 to repair all of the critical bits; both the oil pan and active sway motor still leak. Wow, what's next? I have worked in electronics high-tech industry for over 20 years and many of my colleagues have owned BMWs of one sort or another. It's very common to hear how happy so-in-so was about getting rid of their Beemer after the maintenance contract expired. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Very common in all vehicles.I work in the auto industry for Toyota and this is being done for weight reduction also.We currently use a steel fuel tank but many have gone to plastic fuel tanks.Cafe standards are pushing manufactures for better and better fuel mileage while the consumer wants better safety features power etc etc.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Actually plastic does a better job at dissipating heat a bit better that metal for certain functions. It's cheaper to use, safer and lighter as you say.
That's generally the reason more lives are spares during high speed crashes. If you look at cars built prior to the turn of the century you'll see they are heavy and just a tap to the knee can kill you. I don't think we are using the best components for cars right now in terms of perfection, but as time passes by we will definitely get there. It does however meet the criteria for today's standards in terms of pedestrian safety, efficiency etc...
__________________
Check your mirrors as often as it takes for you to know where everyone is around you! |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
. "Voters will always choose the beautiful lie over the uncomfortable truth" |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
I was thinking along the lines of like a Cadillac Eldorado and such. Also there were virtually no SUV's back then. Thing is everyone wants a safe car and many think bigger (SUV or similar) is safest. You're right cars on the road are heavier than they were back then, but they are filled with more electronics and gadgets. An SUV today weighs what a big car did back then. There are also many, many more cars on the road today than ever before.
__________________
Check your mirrors as often as it takes for you to know where everyone is around you! |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
1970's cars are death traps on wheels . . .
![]()
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yes true cars are still very heavy but manufactures are still fighting weight savings more than ever.1970s cars didn't have 8 or more air bags,Multiple computer modules,Dual zone climate that requires 2,3,4 evaps,catalytic converters with more room for the same size car.Also some of these plastic cars last for many uneventful miles.My 70s car were ready for the scrap heap at 100,000 miles.I mean ragged out.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() ![]() Can you explain that statement. I like to learn new things.
__________________
My toys: '09 Kawasaki Versys ~ '09 BMW 535i '06 Harley Roadking ~ '95 Suzuki DR350S '94 Suzuki DR350S ~ '77 Triumph Tiger '09 Kawi STX15F jet ski ~ '07 Kawi STX12F Jetski '83 Suzi ALT125 three wheeler ~ '06 Dodge Ram 4X4 '07 Yamaha Superjet ~ '10 Kubota B3300SU |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Not surprising since they are 40 years old.
__________________
. "Voters will always choose the beautiful lie over the uncomfortable truth" |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well lets see, there's a plastic air box, plastic intake tubing all the way to the intake manifold which is also hard plastic. There's plastic battery box covers on (not our fives) but modern cars that still have the battery under the hood. Valley pan covers. There is hard plastics for coolant connecting joints and elbows. The majority of the heat a car generates is under the hood, and that's where most of the plastics reside.
http://www.dailytech.com/Plastics+En...ticle16684.htm The car is also able to cool down somewhat faster because of these pieces. Yes metal is definitely a better option for heat transfer and conductivity, but you don't necessarily want the slightest amount of heat to cause your intake manifold to reach high temps quickly. So I used the word dissipate wrong up above. It doesn't heat up as much to be able to transfer that heat which is why I used dissipation. Plastics will be used wherever possible as to reduce weight and minimize heat buildup. Carbon fiber is on the way in now. http://www.assemblymag.com/articles/...under-the-hood
__________________
Check your mirrors as often as it takes for you to know where everyone is around you! |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
About dissipations; Yes the aluminum dissipated faster then plastic, but it's produce some composite material that do as good as ceramic. Ex: thermal conductivity for aluminum : around 180 W/mK thermal conductivity for copper : around 360 W/mK thermal conductivity for steel : around 16 W/mK thermal conductivity for composite : around 5-30 W/mK thermal conductivity for plastic : around ~ .5 W/mK max
__________________
BMW CCA Member, Capital Chapter |
|
| Bookmarks |
| Forum Navigation | |||||||
|
Today's Posts Search | ||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|