I'd say if those guys are willing to spend $20,000 on a god-awful, buttfugly body kits then they should have no problem ponying up $10/year for DTM subscriptions.in_d_haus said:I guess DTM power is going to start charging $10/yr for access...prepare for the onslought of ex-DTMers looking for free forums :tsk:
There's "good looking" and "marriage material." Marriage material women are always good looking, but not all good looking women are marriage material.TD said:
I completely understand that distinction.Jetfire said:There's "good looking" and "marriage material." Marriage material women are always good looking, but not all good looking women are marriage material.
Or, how was it that Car and Driver described Ferraris? "There are girls you want to take home to Mom, and then there are the girls you REALLY want to date." Something like that.
:lmao: I would be curious to see how good she is at not being innocent...DougDogs said:I heard her new "best friend" is Jenna Jamison. I guess when people finally realize she has no singing talent, we will see her in porno's :yikes:
edit: not that that would be a bad thing
True, although when it comes down to it, I don't think most guys would be kicking either one of them out of bed...nate328Ci said:The one on the right has definitely taken a huge swing towards distubingly trashy.
I don't find Britney trashy
It seems no matter the subject, you have a problem with it...maybe you should seek help.TD said:I completely understand that distinction.
Still, two-tone hair and heavy eye makeup don't work for me. And in many non-staged photgraphs, she had a truly odd facial look to her. I notice that all of her staged photos are taken from angles that do not show this odd look.
If I have time later, I'll look for an example of what I mean. It looks very trailer park, regardless of what she's wearing, her makeup or hair.
I love it.Nbtstatic said:It seems no matter the subject, you have a problem with it...maybe you should seek help.