That's probably a true statement...nate328Ci said:It also mentions that the styling of the rear is the most important part of the car....
These are Bangle's own words.The HACK said:
Form your own conclusions. This was from Road & Track.
Let the flame wars begin.
I had to eat lunch :dunno:TD said:
That's probably a true statement...
(BTW, why'd you bail on our SMG discussion at the Org?)
Cw? Don't you mean Cd? or drag coefficient?Alex Baumann said:
Wait, I'm diggin up some Cw values of previous and current models of Daimler and Audi. I'll post them later.
yes, Cd that is, my bad. (Cw is the german word for it)nate328Ci said:
Cw? Don't you mean Cd? or drag coefficient?
Remember, increasing downforce also increases drag. The 360 Modena has something like .36 Cd. I am almost certain that the E65 has more drag than the S class.
Alex, Nate is one of the guys who thinks it's GORGEOUS exactly as it is.Alex Baumann said:
yes, Cd that is, my bad. (Cw is the german word for it)
Yes, but it could also have been achieved with a better looking trunk, no ?
Alex Baumann said:
yes, Cd that is, my bad. (Cw is the german word for it)
Yes, but it could also have been achieved with a better looking trunk, no ?
I wouldn't say gorgeous. Attractive enough though :bigpimp:TD said:
Alex, Nate is one of the guys who thinks it's GORGEOUS exactly as it is.