Bull$hit. It is not moralizing, it is about equal opportunities. If brain dead idiot can drive a car while looking at a movie, I want to be able to drive at 180 mph and not be assumed to be a danger to anybody if I do not hurt anybody.
It is a third-world country double standard and I am sick of it being defended just because there are more idiots who would drive while watching a movie than there are idiots who want to drive 180 mph without consequence. Because danger is about equal if not weighing towards the movie-watcher - assuming competent driver doing proper driving at 180 mph.
But you are moralizing... even though your hormonal response might be preventing you from accepting that fact right now. The difference between having video on the navigation screen and driving on the street at 180 mph is that one behavior is legal, the other isn't. Once you've figured out which is which, feel free to take your grousing to the steps of your local state capitol, of find the address of your state rep and senator and take up your crusading there.
Personally I think video in the car is kind of silly... if pressed I might even agree that it
can be (as opposed to being
per se) dangerous. However the issue has been argued to death on this forum and shouldn't be re-flogged every time someone posts a thread asking about an in-dash video retrofit. What you really should be 'sick' of is your obnoxious use of the term "third-world" the offensive nature of which is clearly lost on you.