BimmerFest BMW Forum banner

1 - 6 of 6 Posts

·
I like cookies.
Joined
·
18,102 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
http://www.dimmasales.co.uk/index.html?bmw_debate.php

Very ugly, poor integration. IMO, just silly looking; makes the car look FAT.

While I am not a big fan of widebody converions, this is a very poor imitation of the gorgeous E30 M3. The body lines don't follow anything, door strips don't continue, nor do the side body creases. Look at the TERRIBLE integration of the turn signals. Just lame.

This is a nice integration on an E36 M3, while still following the tradition of the E30 M3.

http://www.bimmerforums.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=55426

Saw the E46 kit here, http://forum.e46fanatics.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=49393
 

·
Rest in peace, Coach
Joined
·
9,106 Posts
"It's not the body kit that makes you look fat, it's the F**KIN' FAT that makes you look fat."
 

·
Astigmatic Visionary
Joined
·
2,802 Posts
Pardon me for being clueless but what is the dweeb in the lower left corner of the Dimma site doing and why?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5 Posts
regarding the big brake kit on the widebody E36 M3
that kit seams un-necessary to me. how much unsprung wieght is that adding? having two calipers could generate more heat with less time for the roater to cool, causing fade.

your braking power is limited to your contact patch, you need good tires to put the braking power to the ground, at what point does the grip of your tires max out and your spending $4g's too much on brakes?

but hey it sure would look cool
 
1 - 6 of 6 Posts
Top