It makes a dramatic difference, even if the engine start switch can't be disabled.
Nick
Nick
i don't even think i understand the point of that statement, with respect to a clutch stop.Originally stated by evilfactoryowne's co-worker
"why get a manual then"....
I totally agree on that one. If pushing in the clutch the extra 2 inches made a difference, then fine, but if it's wasted energy, why bother? Wasting energy doesn't make it more enjoyable...ride365 said:
i don't even think i understand the point of that statement, with respect to a clutch stop.
i believe a stop would make a difference if you find the clutch "sloppy"... it feels like there's 2 or 3 inches of free play in these clutches.
they should functionally be the same. the premise behind the uuc bigboy is that it provides a broader stopping surface, as the clutch lever does have some lateral movement.eugeneDC/TX said:are there any specific reasons to choose one over the other?
not to be argumentative here, but i was correct in saying the BigBoy is broader (larger diameter), and that the clutch lever has lateral play-- that's why a broader surface would be safer.blackdawg said:the UUC motorwerks clutch stop is so wide, it actually impedes the clutch travel even more than ron stygar's clutchstop.
For my 2002, we had to trim about half an inch off the bolt with a hacksaw to get it to work. Otherwise the car wouldn't start. My understanding is that this is only a problem for 2002's and that UUC is working on a new version (Big Boy 2.0) that works in a 2002 without modifications.eugeneDC/TX said:so you dont have any start switch mods? thanks for the info