Joined
·
25,378 Posts
EDIT: As of May 28th, 2015, the E39 is affected (details start at post #41).
EDIT: Only the round "sport" steering wheel is currently affected (details start at post #50).
Eventually, they will recall at least some of our airbags, but every time I call BMWNA, they say the 5 series is unaffected.
Therefore, this thread is opened simply to answer the specific question of why exactly are our E39 airbags NOT YET involved in the BMW recall (actually it's not a recall; it's a "field action") of shrapnel-producing Takata airbags and, when/if the recall extends to the E39 (which it eventually will), then this thread is intended to have all the relevant information we know about getting the soon-to-be-recalled airbags replaced.
For background, the canonical E46 thread on the Takata airbag recall is:
- BMW to Replace Passenger-side Front Airbags in 2000-06 3 Series, As a Precaution (06-28-2014)
Here's a revealing post from that canonical thread:
Which of those factors above don't we have on the E39?
a. Takata?
b. Mexico/Washington?
c. Time frame?
d. Humidity?
EDIT: Only the round "sport" steering wheel is currently affected (details start at post #50).
Eventually, they will recall at least some of our airbags, but every time I call BMWNA, they say the 5 series is unaffected.
Therefore, this thread is opened simply to answer the specific question of why exactly are our E39 airbags NOT YET involved in the BMW recall (actually it's not a recall; it's a "field action") of shrapnel-producing Takata airbags and, when/if the recall extends to the E39 (which it eventually will), then this thread is intended to have all the relevant information we know about getting the soon-to-be-recalled airbags replaced.
For background, the canonical E46 thread on the Takata airbag recall is:
- BMW to Replace Passenger-side Front Airbags in 2000-06 3 Series, As a Precaution (06-28-2014)
Here's a revealing post from that canonical thread:
It's explained in the NYT article I posted above. The propellant is highly sensitive to contamination by moisture, which makes it unstable and prone to "overly energetic combustion." Some of the propellant was suspected to have been improperly stored at Takata's Mexican factory.
Humidity was just one of the suspects Takata investigated while they, Honda, and regulators dragged their feet in warning the public about the defect. Other theories included flaws in the propellant packaging process at a U.S. factory, as well as U.S. workers' circumvention of a QA/QC procedure that would have rejected substandard parts.
Given the information above, it seems confusing (to me) which things are involved, but some of the culprits are apparently: (1) the brand of the airbags (Takata) and (2) the origination and date of the explosive mix (Mexico/Washington, 2001/2002) and (3) the registered location of the car (high humidity states).NY Times article on what happened.
Between late 2001 and late 2002, workers at a Takata factory in Monclova, Mexico, had left out moisture-sensitive explosives on the plant floor, making them prone to "overly energetic combustion,"Takata engineers next linked the defect to its factory in Moses Lake, Wash. Between 2000 and 2002, a flaw in a machine that presses air bag explosives into wafers had made the explosives unstableIn the following months, Takata engineers came up with yet another explanation for the ruptures: Beginning in September 2001, machine operators at the Moses Lake plant could have inadvertently switched off an "auto reject" function that weeded out poorly made explosives that can become unstable
Which of those factors above don't we have on the E39?
a. Takata?
b. Mexico/Washington?
c. Time frame?
d. Humidity?
Attachments
-
181.4 KB Views: 635