Actually, I didn't have the M3 then. I was driving a 2000 328Ci. Their attitude was quite directed at baiting me. I guess.geomax said:
Actually, I didn't have the M3 then. I was driving a 2000 328Ci. Their attitude was quite directed at baiting me. I guess.geomax said:They weren't racing you - they were just trying to get pics of your M3!
Hmmm...those people were real fruitloops then...they're out there....SteveT said:
Actually, I didn't have the M3 then. I was driving a 2000 328Ci. Their attitude was quite directed at baiting me. I guess.
Here's a thought: in many states, there is a traffic offense entitled "aggressive driving" - it usually involves the types of moronic activities that have been written about on this thread. It is a very serious offense, one in which you can go to jail and lose your license. The prosecutors in my state have to prove intent to drive aggressively, which is difficult to do unless the accused driver gives a verbal or non-verbal gesture (such as shooting a bird). Perhaps the photographer was hoping to catch you giving them the finger, with the idea of giving that photo to the police for your prosecution.SteveT said:I had an interesting experience one morning while going to work. There is a spot beyond a light that narrows from four lanes to two, much as Geo has experienced. I was in the yield lane (right), but I accelerated to move ahead of the car on the left. The Toyota CRV (with a flag and multiple stickers attached) was not about to give up the space without a race. I was slightly ahead, but not going to chop them of. While somewhat annoyed by the process, I looked at the woman riding in the passenger's seat and she produced a camera pointed directly at me. It was a strange feeling. She was aggitated, but nothing really happened except a short drag race. It seemed like a setup. They wanted me to try for the spot in front of them and they were going to be beligerent about it and somehow photograph me. We came to a light later, where I was going to turn right and as I went by I gave them another look and she produced the camera again. I guess she expected a familiar gesture (and it crossed my mind), but I just looked. Don't know what these people thought they were up to. I've seen the car since in the same place, but without the passenger.
Dan, you are right. There are some agressive driving laws that carry heavy penalties. I understand agressive situations, like following someone in a store and detaining them in a parking lot. As someone said earlier, it's a very dangerous situation. Belligerence in traffic, baiting, and then photographing the accused (so to speak) is disturbing. I considered calling the police to report the photographic incident myself. I decided that if I saw them doing it again, I would call. I certainly support penalties for reckless drivers. I understand what reckless driving is all about. What concerns me is the inept drivers that we see more and more of. People who line up in the left lane and force faster traffic to go by on the right. I know Virginia has established strong agressive driving laws that include slow drivers holding up traffic. But, how often do you see the slow driver backing up the left lane stopped by police?Dan said:
Here's a thought: in many states, there is a traffic offense entitled "aggressive driving" - it usually involves the types of moronic activities that have been written about on this thread. It is a very serious offense, one in which you can go to jail and lose your license. The prosecutors in my state have to prove intent to drive aggressively, which is difficult to do unless the accused driver gives a verbal or non-verbal gesture (such as shooting a bird). Perhaps the photographer was hoping to catch you giving them the finger, with the idea of giving that photo to the police for your prosecution.
Like I said, it's a crazy world out there - drive carefully.
Then move to Boston. Traffic here would tax even Ghandi's serenity.munk330ci said:This all seems a bit odd to me. I can't relate to those that feel the insatiable desire to teach a lesson or get revenge for an insignificant event. I think most of these traffic issues are irritating, no question. But certainly insignificant and not worth any after-thought. :tsk:
Not Ghandi, Yoda - Virtue not is road-rage for Jedi.geomax said:
Then move to Boston. Traffic here would tax even Ghandi's serenity.
:lmao: :thumbup:munk330ci said:
Not Ghandi, Yoda - Virtue not is road-rage for Jedi.
Depends which side of "The Force" you're on.munk330ci said:
Not Ghandi, Yoda - Virtue not is road-rage for Jedi.
Sorry, but I'm driven by a pet peeve to "educate" drivers here in Chicago on a regular basis. In most intersections, there is a separate left-turn lane, wherein turning vehicles pull forward into the intersection and wait for a break in the oncoming traffic to make their left turn . During busy times of the day (which is most of the time here), oncoming traffic is virtually non-stop, with at least 2-4munk330ci said:This all seems a bit odd to me. I can't relate to those that feel the insatiable desire to teach a lesson or get revenge for an insignificant event. I think most of these traffic issues are irritating, no question. But certainly insignificant and not worth any after-thought. :tsk:
I like this one. :thumbup:YoYoPedro said:
The look of total terror and disbelief in their faces as they contemplate a head-on because of running a red light cannot be described. It really only takes about a foot of forward motion (then stop) on my part to put the scare of God into them.
What is there to like about this ?Mystikal said:
I like this one. :thumbup:
I like it from an entertainment standpoint. I wouldn't actually try it, as I might let out the clutch too much, slip off the pedal, etc etc. Just saying it's funny.Alan F said:
What is there to like about this ?
It goes under the whole premise where this discussion began which is teaching the other guy a lesson. . . One day he's going to do that to an uncapable driver who is going to panic and have an accident and god willing the person hopefully won't get killed . . .
Eventually, if that person continues to run red lights, they WILL cause an accident, where hopefully nobody ELSE gets hurt. The damage that they might do to themselves I consider thinning of the herd...Alan F said:
What is there to like about this ?
It goes under the whole premise where this discussion began which is teaching the other guy a lesson. . . One day he's going to do that to an uncapable driver who is going to panic and have an accident and god willing the person hopefully won't get killed . . .
1) How about my priviledge?Dan said:As tempting as it may be in certain circumstances, it is simply and clearly NOT your responsibility, right, duty or job to "teach" any other driver a lesson, no matter how big an as*hole they are. The law is not on your side here.
1) Nope, in every state, driving is a privelege, not a right. There is no privelege allowed for teaching someone else a lesson.YoYoPedro said:
1) How about my priviledge?
2) Or my pleasure?
3) Which law would that be?
I'd rather not get pulled into an argument about semantics :bigpimp: , so I apologize if I was unclear.Dan said:
1) Nope, in every state, driving is a privelege, not a right. There is no privelege allowed for teaching someone else a lesson.
2) It won't be pleasurable if your actions cause an accident, a violent confrontation, or your arrest.
3) Most states have aggressive driving laws that prohibit seeking retribution on the road. Teaching another driver a lesson is illegal, and could land you in jail, with a huge fine and the loss of your driving priveleges.
I am a lawyer, and I've only been relating some of the potential legal ramifications in an attempt to prevent you from getting into trouble someday. Personally, I used to enjoy teaching other as*hole drivers a lesson in my younger days, but as you get older, you also get wiser. Peace, and be careful out there - the life you save may be your own: there are a lot of nut cases driving around with loaded weapons in their vehicles.YoYoPedro said:
5) You say you're a slacker but you really should consider being an attorney...![]()