BMW Forum - BimmerFest BMW Forums banner

[E70] 2013 BMW X5 35i -Engine Malfunction/Reduced Power- @ 98K mi

15K views 13 replies 5 participants last post by  mpogan78  
#1 · (Edited)
The almighty BMW gods have recently blessed me with a rather bizarre powertrain symptom on my 2013 E70 X5 35i Premium...I could use some guidance if anyone else has also experienced the same. Here's my story:

I had just finished placing my groceries into the trunk of my X5 after my weekly grocery haul. Now ready to leave I placed my foot on the brakes and pressed the ignition to start the car. The flawless roar of the engine on startup reaffirmed another joyous drive ahead. I shifted into reverse and then placed my right hand on the backside of the front passenger seat headrest feeling my fingers sink into the luxurious cinnamon-brown Nevada leather. Vigilant for any rogue shopping carts or height-challenged patrons I then turned my neck to aim my sight through the rear windshield. I began to make my exit from the parking spot...or so I thought.

Unexpectedly, like an inlaw visiting your home in an 00s sitcom, the X5 immediately went into reduced engine power mode and shut off mid reverse procedure. Surprised by the sudden stoppage, I tried the reliable IT trick we've all come to love - I pressed the ignition button while my foot was on the breaks to turn off the engine and then pressed the ignition button again to turn it back on. The engine miraculously turned on but became really rough as indicated by the sputtering RPM tack and an engine malfunction notification appeared on the center screen as well. The SUV was now in limp mode as I exited the parking lot at a max allowed speed of 10-15mph. I courageously, admittedly stupidly, continued to drive to see if I could get back home to bring the splendors of my original quest to my clan and to also figure out what was happening under the X5's hood.

Unfortunately, I didn't make it very far. About 2 minutes down the road all engine power was completely diminished to what I can only describe as a supple punch from an enraged hamster. The car slowed from 10mph to an even more anxiety-inducing 1mph. Even as I repeatedly and desperately pressed my pedal to the metal in hopes of giving it some juice, I could feel my X5's will to live escape through the strained engine vibrations running through my now sweaty palms that were clasped tight to the heated steering wheel. It was becoming more evident that the X5 no longer carried a spark for life beyond this journey.

Using the remaining momentum of this metallic behemoth I veered our course into an adjacent narrow residential street and luckily glided into an open parking spot along the curb. It was at this moment that all visible street lights synchronously illuminated as their sensors had been triggered by a dense fog that was descending upon this neighborhood. Unsettling darkness now cast itself as the fog enveloped all visible light in its path. "Could this be our Valhalla?", I thought as I stared out into the now increasingly disappearing view of the street we had crashed landed on. Oblivious to my surroundings I immediately acted by instinctively pulling out my handy OBDII tool, like a trained swordsman (who had forgotten he originally had a sword but just remembered when he needed it the most), from my glove box and began scanning for a diagnosis. I also reached into a grocery bag for some snacks as I knew it would be a while before help would arrive and/or solve this mysterious case. Over the years I had learned it is not best practice, if it can be avoided, to diagnose car trouble while hungry. This was not my first rodeo nor would I be naive enough to believe it was my last.

After a complete system scanning, the OBDII listed a handful of fault codes. The codes that were displayed were as follows:

(1) Confirmed Trouble Code:
P00BC: Mass or Volume Air Flow "A" Circuit Range/Performance - Air Flow Too Low

(2) Pending Trouble Codes:
P10E0: VVL-Overload Protection Control Motor System Shutdown (Bank 1)
P00BC: Mass of Volume Air Flow "A Circuit" Range/ Performance - Air Flow Too Low

(6) Engine Codes:
2E0F: Status: Active - Valvetronic System: deactivated, excess adjustment error
2DD8: Status: History - Valvetronic-actuator, position sensor: signal implausible
2DD6: Status: History - Valvetronic -actuator, position sensor: Short to ground or open circuit
2DE5: Status: History - Tank level sensor, right: signal
2DE9: Status: History - Valvetronic actuator: module protection, shut down system
2775: Status: History - Air mass, plausibility: Air mass too low

The rough idle was still present when I restarted the car at the curb. The X5 would now only lurch forward at 5mph max and the engine would sputter RPMs drastically/violently. It got to a point where I could tell it was not worth any further potential damage to continue running the engine. I decided to bite the bullet and call for a tow to my local euro repair shop because this was now out of my wheelhouse of car breakdown experiences. The tow truck driver's arrival was timely and my X5 was finally on its way to the shop 3 hours after my initial tow confirmation. I wasn't going to complain, though I want you all to know that it was not a pleasant wait. I was mostly elated that I was one step closer to getting my car back in working order.

Flash forward a couple of days later. I hadn't received any updates from the shop so I worryingly gave them a call. While speaking with the repair tech, they mentioned they were still diagnosing the problem and at the time of the call potentially determined that the engine issue could be the variable timing system. The invoice I received lists the following codes that were picked up on their diagnostic tool:

Current Codes:
2E0F - Valvetronic system deactivated, adjustment fault too frequent
2E10 - Valvetronic system disabled, feedback control deviations exceeded

History Codes:
2DCE - Valvetronic system, no adjustment possible
2DD8 - Valvetronic servomotor, signal implausible
2DD6 - Valvetronic servomotor, short circuit or line disconnection

The tech then recommended removing the valve cover to inspect the Valvetronic camshaft which would come at an additional fee. I've been in this game long enough to know that it always does. I appreciated their asking and confirmed that they should proceed to investigate further.

A few days after the last call I received an update from the tech with his findings. They found some signs of wear in the camshaft and suggested they replace the valvetronic servomotor and camshaft to ultimately resolve the car's issue.

During this repair the tech removed and replaced the following parts, as listed on the invoice:
  • Camshaft adjuster solenoid
  • Valve Cover
  • Camshaft bearing (qty:6)
  • Oil spraying nozzle
  • Stopper bolt
  • Breather hose
  • Fuel injector seal (qty:6)
  • Engine wiring harness
After the repair was complete and the tech had a few successful test drives in, he concluded that the vehicle was performing as it should and that he did not experience any of the original symptoms. All sounded good over the phone and so I happily went to pick up the car almost immediately after hearing the news!

I paid $2,750 in total for the above-listed parts and about 8 hrs of labor. I'm unsure of standard rates for this but maybe someone can let me know if that was a good/bad deal. I was originally quoted slightly higher than this amount so I'll take the L (read: "learning opportunity") and move on.

While I was sorting this invoice, the tech mentioned that I should bring the car back if I experience any similar engine issues. He said that if the issue persists it could likely be a compromised DME and it may also need to be replaced to fully resolve this from happening again. They quoted replacing the DME w/ wiring harness at $3,500. I thought this over but decided to take the X5 back home and would continue to drive/monitor for any further symptoms while also reassessing my car repair budget so I didn't go overboard if it wasn't absolutely necessary at that moment. Unexpected costs in my healthcare budget have also taken a toll but that's a story for another time.

Wondrously, there were no recurring engine issues for the last 3 days. From the time I picked the X5 up from the shop to the last 40miles of pure driving nirvana...until today.

While leaving work this evening I received the dreaded 'Engine Malfunction' & 'Reduced Engine Power' notification on my center screen. I just felt so defeated after going through the first round. This time, however, the engine did not sputter as violently as it did before. I really only felt/saw a slight sputtering of RPMs during engine start-up and idle but it was otherwise normal-ish. The 'Reduced Engine Power' notification noted that it was fine to drive for a short distance so I chose to drive it home to look into it further. I felt a bit more confident now that it wasn't driving as bad as my first experience. The check engine light was still illuminated as I pulled into my driveway, so I knew we weren't out of the woods quite yet.

Once home, I decided to hook up my OBDII tool to take a closer look. I restarted the X5's engine after grabbing my OBDII tool that was transferred over to my Z4's trunk during the X5's hiatus. Upon startup, the check engine light was still illuminated in my dash cluster but the 'Engine Malfunction' & 'Reduced Engine Power' notifications were no longer appearing. I'm completely at a loss for why but I assume the check engine light is a proxy for these notifications as it's tired of telling me these things at this point. I'll try again tomorrow morning to see if this remains consistent. Nonetheless, my most recent scans showed the following codes:

(1) Confirmed Trouble Code:
P1030 - VVL-Actuator Monitoring Position Control; Tight, no Adjustment possible (Bank 1)

(1) Pending Trouble Code:
P1030 - VVL-Actuator Monitoring Position Control; Tight, no Adjustment possible (Bank 1)

(1) Permanent Trouble Code:
P1030 - VVL-Actuator Monitoring Position Control; Tight, no Adjustment possible (Bank 1)

(2) Engine Codes:

2E0F - Status: Active - Valvetronic System: deactivated, excessive adjustment error
2DCE - Status: History - Valvetronic System: no adjustment possible

The answer to this problem becomes more apparent as I'm typing this all out at my computer now. The compromised DME + wiring harness may be the culprit but I want to see if anyone else may have experienced the same or if anyone may have some insight in other areas to check before hanging my head low, biting another bullet, and taking it back to the repair shop.

Honestly, at this point in the war, I'm just dazed at the thought of spending thousands more for an uncertain fix while also not being able to enjoy my metallic behemoth the same way I used to. I would be so sad to part with it if it does come to that.

I hope the information I presented was somewhat helpful for you all to understand the issue this X5 is having. I understand this is a huge ask to expect anyone to review the information presented above as if it's not an exercise in parsing through an exhaustive melodramatic rant about my car troubles. Just like after my first car breakdown, I'm feeling overly optimistic that somewhere, someone has also experienced the same and may have a fix too.

So with that said, I would greatly appreciate any and all suggestions, insights, links to past forum discussions, thoughts, alternative solutions to this problem I'm facing. I have also attached the generated reports from my latest scan for your review if needed. Please do let me know if any further information would be helpful to dissect potential fixes.
 

Attachments

#2 ·
By the time I got to the end, I had to stop for food.

Then I forgot what the first part had said...

But I do like how they shotgunned it with your money, then to cover their a$$es they add a 'bad DME and harness' cover story

I wont comment much on the 2700, seems high. Higher still when it didnt fix it.

It is virtually impossible for ALL the DME and harness AND VVT system to all go bad simultaneously. Simply put, it is ONE fault- they just havent fixed it yet.
 
#3 ·
For me food is an hour away, but I am having my preprandial wine.

This is how I imagine such a horror story should proceed. At your BMW Service Center execute a work authorization to the effect of; “Customer states: (your root problem simply stated) car won’t go. Diagnose, estimate and cure.”

You will pay! You will pay an hour labor equivalent to hook up the computer. You will pay the minimal hours for the Test / Service Plan troubleshooting. You MAY pay the estimated cost of the cure. You will engage your state’s consumer protection laws of goodworkmanship and parts merchantability for two years. If the goodworkmanship that you authorized and paid for fails, then the onus is on the dealer. You should have no further liability.
 
#4 ·
Please dont think you have a 'dme and harness issue'...nothing in this would point to that.

IMO they too you for a bit of a ride. "wear in the camshaft area"???? And replace 6 camshaft bearings?

I want to see that they replaced the VVT motor, did they? Its not on the list, althiguh you do mention it. I would say they did something wrong.


But dont let them tell you its something else, suck $3500 out of your wallet, and fix it when it should be free.

I may be off base here, Im putting out the bat signal for hotgrbg....
 
#5 ·
It sounds like they diagnosed it right but didn’t do the repair right. I’ll guess maybe they didn’t replace the needle bearings or didn’t apply the grease to the teeth of the new eccentric shaft. I’ve never seen a DME cause these faults. Isn’t there some warranty on the money you already paid out since it wasn’t repaired properly the first time? What are your states consumer protection laws?
 
#6 ·
[thumbsup]

Of course the challenge is going back to he first plaice and PROVING they did it wrong. And not having them say 'yeah, its the DME and harness like we told you'....

OP, you should probably be slighlty assertive when going back- "I had a tech I know elsewhere review it and they suspect [insert Hot's explanation]. Id like you to check that]

If they want a dime, refuse- tell them next step is a dealer and you will come back to them if it was their fault.
 
#7 · (Edited)
It’s all purely speculative until he shows up to me with 200$ to inspect in person. Truth be told I’d probably Quote to remove valve cover and inspect. The N55 does not have an eccentric shaft sensor but instead the DME watches motor amperage and uses the position sensor data located IN the valvetronic motor. The fact that the vehicle drove fine several times shows the wiring intact and probably trouble free as a wire is either bad or it’s not. Period. Wiring is diagnosed through voltage drops, resistance checks, oscilloscope measurements and continuity checks. Without a valid failure reason with repeatable evidence it’s bullshit.
The point I was making isn’t that they did it wrong cause we don’t know that but instead that they made an expensive repair which didn’t fix the vehicle. That’s a fact.
You should get credit to the cost of whatever they think will fix it this time and you can state consumer protection laws on goods and services rendered. You paid money for diagnosis and repair of a problem that was either not diagnosed properly or repaired adequately. My next step would be asking for the diagnostic steps taken to prove the “DME and harness” has a problem as this sounds like another guess.
1700 or 3500 could pay for a whole lot of diagnosis and it’s your right to know what exact measurements made the “tech” conclude it needs a DME/harness. Mechanics guess and use parts shotguns. Techs run test plans, take measurements, form hypothesis, confirm failures. Every once in a great while a guess is necessary but not until after exhausting many diagnostic steps.
People bash dealers constant for prices but are happy to let independent monkeys guess away since they are cheaper. Are they really cheaper though if things like this occur?
 
#8 · (Edited)
Truly appreciative of everyone's input thus far. I am taking notes and learning a great deal. I will be speaking with the shop tomorrow about the next steps. I will discuss avoiding any further diagnosis towards the DME and will see about using leverage with credits/warranty to assess any lapses in the work already performed.

Edit: The shop offers 12,000miles or 1 year of warranty on parts and labor.

I am located in Washington state if that makes any difference for the associated consumer laws. I plan to do some further research on my state's consumers laws to make my argument sound as well.

Thanks, everyone! I have a great deal of respect for this community.
 
#9 ·
I spoke with the shop today and discussed my intended stance from my previous reply above. They were still adamant about their original DME diagnosis.

They stated the following in their response to what I had gathered in this thread:

"The needle bearings were replaced during your last repair, and not only did the eccentric shaft teeth get lubricated, but they are constantly lubricated from the oil in the engine. I would nicely refer them to BMWs Technical service bulletin website. In all reality there are several, but Si-B12-19-16 addressees Valve-tronic actuator position faults caused by a poor, or failed harness connection.
Also, Si B11-06-16 addresses eccentric shaft sensor faults due to a failed DME, due to a failed valve-tronic sensor wiring harness. There is information around the failure of the DME due to a failed harness coming from the valve-tronic sensor. There is information regarding the failure of the valve-tronic motor, they will seize, and fail. There is also information on the failure of the eccentric shaft itself.
Sometimes the correct repair is to replace everything in that system. Sometimes just the replacement of the sensor itself repairs the issue. Each situation and repair is unique and needs to be recommended as such.
In your situation we have recommended repairs be performed in steps, hoping for an end result of replacing fewer parts rather than everything all at once. If you are still experiencing faults and symptoms, the next step will be to replace the DME."

Any thoughts on this response given your experience on these repairs @HotGrbg or anyone else?
 
#13 · (Edited)
This is all under the assumption you have N55 engine. According to VIN decoder you do which I already anticipated.
I cannot post information obtained from TIS but I can tell you these guys are jackasses. I’ll send you the SIBs privately if you want.
SIB 12 19 16 is only in reference to N63R engine and doesn’t apply to your vehicle or engine in any way shape or form. It also describes a pin retention issue which has nothing to do with your situation.
SIB 11 06 16 is only applicable to N52 variants and again not applicable to your vehicle or engine. This old bulletin is in reference to oil in the sensor harness which the community is very familiar with. Oil can crawl up the harness into the DME and ruin it but oil cannot leak into the N55 motor connector from underneath and there is no “sensor”. The eccentric shaft position sensor is built into the motor itself. Only N52 variants have this style sensor they are describing.
Your title is “2013 X5” which means you have N55 engine. If I use VIN decoder it also says N55.
If they are just quoting bulletins because it says “valvetronic” somewhere in it then I can quote about 100 worthless bulletins that don’t apply to your car or engine and it doesn’t mean shit as IT DOES NOT APPLY.
Also short test and looking at an SIB doesn’t qualify as “diagnosis”. Even for the bulletins they referenced which don’t even apply what steps were taken to confirm the situations described? Surely a “bad harness” can be tested or is it just magic? SMH.
They are correct that the gears are lubricated with engine oil with a spray nozzle held on with an 11mm or 12mm banjo bolt…but as per BMW repair instructions the gears have to be coating with a special grease as well. They should have replaced 1-valvetronic motor, 2- eccentric shaft, and 3- needle bearings. There is no “ step by step” as the 3 items mentioned ARE the repair. You either get that or it’s improperly done.
Let’s say they did replace all these parts; how confident are we in their repair if they are not doing any real diagnosis, quoting bulletins that don’t apply to your car, sensors that don’t exist and spending your money with frivolous disregard?
But let’s step back a second…if this was “a unique step and situational for every car” then shouldn’t have they told you about the possibility up front? These guys are clowns.
#1- your car is not fixed
#2- you paid a lot of money for a repair under the assumption it was the complete fix
#3- they from what I can tell aren’t actually diagnosing anything other than a short test and looking up SIBs that don’t apply.
There IS a few rare instances where if the valvetronic issue is ignored for long enough it can fry the DME driver for valvetronic but its rare and the vehicle usually doesn’t run when this occurs.
Again this can be confirmed from diagnostic tests and not just quoting SIBs that don’t apply to your car.
I would demand your money back for the labor at minimum. I would contact the BBB and also look into consumer protection laws in your state. It’s sad that people think Indy shops are the answer to dealership high costs as this is the product you get at many of these “European specialists”. True some Indy shops are great but many are not and by the time you find out your paying more than if you went to the dealer to start with.